Having played this, some quick comments!
First of all, I did enjoy it a great deal, especially the well-clued and entirely fair and completely ridiculous puzzle about
It's not easy to make a case this gleefully dumb without making it completely obtuse and frustrating, so I congratulate you on sticking to the comp theme while still making a game that's fun to play. And this is really VERY ambitious for a complete gag trial, so credit for that, too.
One gameplay issue:
The case comp makes it hard to judge a case like this, full of deliberate doofiness. I think one potential issue is that the tone is too consistently ridiculous
. That's not to say that it shouldn't be, but that comedy requires some kind of contrast. If everything is ridiculous at all times, there's not enough variety to keep each joke funny.
But even if many of the jokes don't land, there are just so many jokes
that I was bound to laugh at some point, and for the most part, this case is quite good at making the player feel like they're participating in the joke
, rather than just having a prank played on them.
I think if this were going up for featured case, I'd recommend polishing it more - adding more responses to unexpected presentations, expanding some of the jokes, and so on. "Deliberately bad" is funny, but "deliberately bad and yet very polished in all respects
" is even funnier, because it means you put a ton of effort into making an absurd thing perfect.